Any thoughts?
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bensr16 |
Were the union actually whipped? |
Lead | ||
|
Just finished Detzer's book on the battle, and it seems to me that the union army still had some fight left in it, and that it could have remained at Centerville and been resupplied there.
Any thoughts? |
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #1 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #2 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #3 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #4 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #5 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #6 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #7 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #8 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #9 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | #10 | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Soontir Solo |
Re: Unknown | #11 | ||
|
No the Union wasn't whipped. They were embarrassed but overall the casualties weren't that bad at all. They were whipped at 2nd Manassas though.
|
||||
|
|
||||
blueridge |
Re: Unknown | #12 | ||
|
I think the fact that quite a few of them got back to DC that night or the next morning after it took them 2 or 3 days to march out to Manassas speaks to the fact that they were whipped. The casualties weren't that bad for later in the war...but nobody had expereinced casualties like that YET so they were shocked by such loss of life and bloodshed. The army was green and that added to the panic that occured as the battle turned against them.
Even though they were beaten worse under Pope the next year, no panic stricken retreat resulted from it. They fought stubbornly as they left the field and came off in good order despite heavier losses... so the "beat down" was worse at 2nd Manassas but the "skedaddle" was worse after the 1st one. |
||||
|
|
||||
Missouri Brigade |
Re: Unknown | #13 | ||
|
blueridge
Greetings, You posted: "nobody had expereinced casualties like that YET so they were shocked by such loss of life and bloodshed. The army was green and that added to the panic that occured as the battle turned against them.........the "beat down" was worse at 2nd Manassas but the "skedaddle" was worse after the 1st one." My reply: Excellent and succinct analysis, IMHO. The Union Army at First Bull Run was indeed whipped, and whipped badly. I think one has to look back to the battles for New York during the Revolutionary War to find an instance previous to First Bull Run where US troops paniced, turned and ran on such a scale as what happened at First Manasses. So complete was the rout, that had the Confederate forces not been so green and unorganized, they could have waltzed into Washington DC. However, despite the "spanking" administered to it the Union Army was not destroyed, nor are you claiming it was. It would rise from the ashes of this ignoble affair and be molded into a feared and respected fighting force, but not for several weeks after First Bull Run could those efforts begin in earnest. Your mention of the casualty figures and their effect in precipitating the eventual paniced retreat is on point, and if anything, may not have been emphasized strongly enough. The scale of the casualties inflicted were also a factor in Longstreets successful skirmishes in the days leading up to First Bull Run. The negative psychological effects resulting from the scale of the casualties during the first few month's of the fighting is often overlooked, so congratulations in pointing out the relationship. For me, one of the interesting things about First Bull Run has to be the fact that although a through rout of the Union Army happened, there were in fact some Union elements which never broke and maintained their unit's integrity during the withdrawal back to Washington D.C.. However, such units were definately in the minority. Regards, MB |
||||
|
|
||||
TheFewTheProud07 |
Re: Unknown | #14 | ||
Quote: They were also getting hounded by what would usually be ineffective cavalry actions by Ranford and Stuart to a lesser scale. What was called by the Union as the "Black Horse Cavalry" was sandwiching and making the units bunch up and collide as they retreated. Especially remember this around the Sherman's part of the line. Also, Kershaw destroyed the Cub Run bridge and fired a few artillery shots, which turned out to be a pretty successful move on his part. The union had to abandon a bunch of wagons and cannon because the runs' banks were too steep. Few |
||||
|
|
||||
hendrickms24 |
Re: Unknown | #15 | ||
Quote: Lets not forget the Battle of Bladensburg (Bladensburg Races) during the War of 1812. The British force rioted the US Army and captured Washington DC. This is far worse then New York or Bull Run since Washington City was burned and the US at the time out numbered the British forces. Mark M. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
All Rights Reserved. The American Civil War 1861 - 1865 Civil War Message Board, Discussion Group, Civil War Trivia, Civil War Books, Causes of the Civil War, War Between the States, American Civil War
|